保護原始森林的理由：為什麼最古老的森林是我們抵禦氣候變遷的最佳屏障
The Pacific Northwest's old-growth forests, stretching 2,500 miles from north of San Francisco into Alaska, are among the most effective carbon-storage systems on Earth — and the older and bigger a tree grows, the more carbon it holds and pulls from the air. That's the central argument of Canopy of Titans by Paul Koberstein and Jessica Applegate, who contend that cutting fossil fuel emissions alone won't solve climate change without also addressing 300 years of legacy carbon already in the atmosphere. Koberstein's solution is disarmingly simple: protect the existing old trees and let them keep working, while sourcing timber, paper, and construction wood from tree farms. The machine, he argues, already exists and is already running — humans just have to stop cutting it down.
- Paul Koberstein and co-author Jessica Applegate wrote Canopy of Titans to investigate what the big trees of the Pacific Northwest can do for the climate.
- The old forests examined in the book stretch roughly 2,500 miles north of San Francisco into Alaska.
- Koberstein argues that older, larger trees store more carbon and continue drawing carbon from the air every day, making them among the planet's most effective carbon-storage systems.
- Koberstein states that halting fossil fuel emissions alone will not solve climate change and that trees are the only mechanism capable of addressing roughly 300 years of legacy atmospheric carbon.
- Canopy of Titans frames forest protection as a hopeful, ready-made climate solution, with Koberstein saying "all we have to do is protect these trees."
- Koberstein contends that timber, paper, and housing wood needs can be met by existing tree farms, so natural old-growth forests can be left standing.
- This article and accompanying audiogram are based on a 2026 interview with Paul Koberstein, who is credited as the author.
保護原始森林的理由：為什麼最古老的森林是我們抵禦氣候變遷的最佳屏障
當保羅·科伯斯坦和他的合著者傑西卡·阿普爾蓋特開始寫作時 泰坦之冠該計畫最初源於一項調查，調查提出了一個看似簡單的問題：“太平洋西北地區的大樹究竟能為氣候做些什麼？”
經過多年的挖掘，最終得出的答案使這本書更像是一場慶典，也更像是一場爭論。
The argument is this. The old forests stretching some 2,500 miles north of San Francisco into Alaska are not scenery, not wilderness set-aside, and not merely a timber reserve. They are among the most effective carbon-storage systems on the planet, and the older and bigger a tree gets, the more carbon it holds and the more it keeps drawing out of the air every single day.
“這些是我們應該保護的樹木，”科伯斯坦說，“古樹、大樹、儲存碳最多的樹木。”
That framing matters because the dominant climate conversation is built almost entirely around emissions: stop burning fossil fuels and the problem is solved. Koberstein agrees we must stop burning fossil fuels — but insists that on its own it is not enough.
“If that’s all we do, we’re not going to solve climate change,” he says. “We need to also do something about the legacy of carbon that we put out into the air over the last 300 years. And the only thing that can do that is trees.”
這是一個披著警示外衣、實則充滿希望的論點。一位播客主持人告訴科伯斯坦，他原本以為這本書會令人絕望，結果卻發現它充滿了希望，因為它提出了一個解決方案——一個切實可行的方案。這台機器已經存在，並且已經在運作。
「我們只需要讓他們完成這項工作就行了，」他說。
“我們只需要保護這些樹木就行了。”
We will still need timber, paper and wood for our houses; those can come from tree farms, of which there are plenty. The ask is narrower and more urgent: leave the existing natural forests standing, and let them keep erasing carbon from the air.
編者註：
This article and audiogram were created based on a 2026 interview with Paul Koberstein. This is why he is the credited author.
抄本
automatically disappear. And they’re they’re investing hundreds of billions of dollars to find this technology. And so far, they’ve been able to remove about one-tenth of one percent of annual emissions, which is not even a drop in the bucket. So a technological solution to climate change is not happening. And we should forget about the idea that it might. But we have a solution that is already here. It’s already doing the work. It needs to be done. And all we have to do is let them complete the job. All we have to do is protect these trees.
We need trees, we need toilet paper, we need h wood for our houses. Fine. We could grow…get that from tree farms, and there are plenty of those around. But the existing natural forests, let them grow, let them continue doing the job of erasing this carbon from the environment from
What is the main argument of Canopy of Titans?
The book argues that the old, big trees of the Pacific Northwest are among the most effective carbon-storage systems on the planet, and that protecting them is essential climate action. Authors Paul Koberstein and Jessica Applegate frame these forests not as scenery or timber reserves, but as a working climate solution.
Why are older, bigger trees better for climate defence?
According to Paul Koberstein, the older and bigger a tree gets, the more carbon it holds and the more it continues to draw out of the air every day. That makes mature old-growth trees more valuable for carbon storage than younger replacements.
Where are the old-growth forests discussed in Canopy of Titans located?
The forests stretch roughly 2,500 miles north of San Francisco into Alaska, covering the Pacific Northwest coastal region.
Is stopping fossil fuel emissions enough to solve climate change?
Koberstein says no — while we must stop burning fossil fuels, that alone won't be enough. He argues we also need to address the legacy of carbon emitted over the last 300 years, and trees are the only mechanism that can remove it.
How can we still get timber if old-growth forests are protected?
Koberstein says timber, paper, and wood for housing can come from tree farms, which already exist in large numbers. The narrower ask is to leave existing natural old-growth forests standing.
What does Koberstein mean by "the machine already exists"?
He means the carbon-removal system — old-growth forests — is already in place and actively working. Humans don't need to build new technology; we simply need to protect these trees and let them finish the job.
Why has Canopy of Titans been described as a hopeful book?
Despite covering a climate crisis, the book presents a doable, existing solution rather than doom and gloom. One podcaster told Koberstein he expected pessimism but found hope, because protecting old forests is an achievable action.
Which trees does Paul Koberstein say we should prioritize protecting?
Koberstein specifically points to "the old trees, the big trees, the trees that store the most carbon." These mature natural forests, not tree farms, are the priority for protection.
The Forest Behind The Timber: Paul Koberstein Podcast
2星期前[…] The Case for Old Growth: Why the Oldest Forests Are Our Best Climate Defence […]